Fabrizio Andaloro holds a clear edge over Giulio Perego in the Roehampton 2 Challenger qualifying match on outdoor hard courts, driven by his superior ATP ranking near 522 and career-high of 288 compared to Perego’s position around 883. Andaloro brings more consistent recent results across ITF and Challenger levels, while Perego has posted multiple first- or second-round exits on hard surfaces in the preceding weeks, including losses in Roehampton-area events. The pair meets for the first time, with no established head-to-head trends. As a qualifying-round contest, the outcome hinges on current form, serve efficiency on the faster hard courts, and any late adjustments to player fitness or scheduling. Trader consensus reflects these ranking and momentum gaps in implied probabilities for advancement.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedGiulio Perego – Fabrizio Andaloro
Moneyline
$262 Vol.
This market will resolve to 'Giulio Perego' if Giulio Perego advances against Fabrizio Andaloro.
This market will resolve to 'Fabrizio Andaloro' if Fabrizio Andaloro advances against Giulio Perego.
If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 7, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50.
If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances.
If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Market Opened: Aug 23, 2026, 7:06 PM ET
Resolution Source
https://www.atptour.com/en/scores/currentResolver
0x65070BE91...Giulio Perego – Fabrizio Andaloro
Moneyline
$262 Vol.
This market will resolve to 'Giulio Perego' if Giulio Perego advances against Fabrizio Andaloro.
This market will resolve to 'Fabrizio Andaloro' if Fabrizio Andaloro advances against Giulio Perego.
If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 7, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50.
If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances.
If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Market Opened: Aug 23, 2026, 7:06 PM ET
Resolution Source
https://www.atptour.com/en/scores/currentResolver
0x65070BE91...Fabrizio Andaloro holds a clear edge over Giulio Perego in the Roehampton 2 Challenger qualifying match on outdoor hard courts, driven by his superior ATP ranking near 522 and career-high of 288 compared to Perego’s position around 883. Andaloro brings more consistent recent results across ITF and Challenger levels, while Perego has posted multiple first- or second-round exits on hard surfaces in the preceding weeks, including losses in Roehampton-area events. The pair meets for the first time, with no established head-to-head trends. As a qualifying-round contest, the outcome hinges on current form, serve efficiency on the faster hard courts, and any late adjustments to player fitness or scheduling. Trader consensus reflects these ranking and momentum gaps in implied probabilities for advancement.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedBeware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions
Build a combo
Select two options
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions