Guinea-Bissau's upcoming 6 December 2026 legislative election for the 102-seat National People's Assembly occurs amid a transitional period following the 2025 coup and junta-led scheduling of polls. The proportional representation system and multiparty field contribute to a fragmented contest, with Platforma Republicana “Nô Kumpu Guiné” and FREPASNA holding the narrowest leads in trader pricing due to their established bases and recent visibility in the transition. Smaller parties such as PS, PT, FLING, and MUNDO-GB trail significantly, reflecting limited organizational reach. Tight positioning stems from ongoing coalition dynamics, historical volatility in voter alignments, and absence of decisive polling shifts or endorsements in the pre-campaign phase. Developments including candidate finalization, ECOWAS monitoring outcomes, or public statements from transitional authorities could alter relative support ahead of voting.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedGuinea-Bissau National People's Assembly Election Winner
FREPASNA 8.3%
PS 5.6%
PT 4.6%
FLING 4.5%
$157,152 Vol.
$157,152 Vol.
FREPASNA
28%
PS
6%
PT
5%
FLING
4%
MUNDO-GB
3%
Platforma Reupblicana “Nô Kumpu Guiné”
31%
FREPASNA 8.3%
PS 5.6%
PT 4.6%
FLING 4.5%
$157,152 Vol.
$157,152 Vol.
FREPASNA
28%
PS
6%
PT
5%
FLING
4%
MUNDO-GB
3%
Platforma Reupblicana “Nô Kumpu Guiné”
31%
This market will resolve to the political party or coalition that wins the greatest number of seats in the National People's Assembly of Guinea-Bissau.
If voting in the National People's Assembly of Guinea-Bissau election does not occur by December 31, 2026, this market will resolve to "Other".
In the event of a tie between this party or coalition and any other for the most seats won, this market will be resolved in favor of the party or coalition whose listed abbreviation or name appears first in alphabetical order.
This market's resolution will be based solely on the number of seats won by the named party or coalition in the National People's Assembly.
This market will resolve based on the result of the election as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by the government of Guinea-Bissau, specifically the National Election Commission (Comissão Nacional de Eleições, CNE) (http://www.cne.gw/).
Market Opened: Nov 7, 2025, 11:46 AM ET
Resolver
0x2F5e3684c...This market will resolve to the political party or coalition that wins the greatest number of seats in the National People's Assembly of Guinea-Bissau.
If voting in the National People's Assembly of Guinea-Bissau election does not occur by December 31, 2026, this market will resolve to "Other".
In the event of a tie between this party or coalition and any other for the most seats won, this market will be resolved in favor of the party or coalition whose listed abbreviation or name appears first in alphabetical order.
This market's resolution will be based solely on the number of seats won by the named party or coalition in the National People's Assembly.
This market will resolve based on the result of the election as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by the government of Guinea-Bissau, specifically the National Election Commission (Comissão Nacional de Eleições, CNE) (http://www.cne.gw/).
Resolver
0x2F5e3684c...Guinea-Bissau's upcoming 6 December 2026 legislative election for the 102-seat National People's Assembly occurs amid a transitional period following the 2025 coup and junta-led scheduling of polls. The proportional representation system and multiparty field contribute to a fragmented contest, with Platforma Republicana “Nô Kumpu Guiné” and FREPASNA holding the narrowest leads in trader pricing due to their established bases and recent visibility in the transition. Smaller parties such as PS, PT, FLING, and MUNDO-GB trail significantly, reflecting limited organizational reach. Tight positioning stems from ongoing coalition dynamics, historical volatility in voter alignments, and absence of decisive polling shifts or endorsements in the pre-campaign phase. Developments including candidate finalization, ECOWAS monitoring outcomes, or public statements from transitional authorities could alter relative support ahead of voting.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated


Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions