**Local-level pushback against Flock Safety license plate readers has intensified in 2026, with dozens of cities and counties canceling contracts or deactivating cameras over data-sharing, privacy, and immigration-enforcement concerns, yet no state has enacted a full ban or statewide pause.** More than 50 jurisdictions have taken such steps since January 2026, including recent actions in Rhode Island, Nebraska, Connecticut towns considering moratoria, and the LAPD’s July suspension pending stronger contractual safeguards. Washington’s SB 6002, effective March 2026, imposed the first statewide limits on ALPR access, retention, and permissible uses without prohibiting deployment. Flock has responded by recommending shorter data-retention periods and adding filters, while lawmakers in several states pursue targeted regulations rather than outright prohibitions. These patterns of localized decisions and incremental oversight, rather than uniform state-level bans, underpin traders’ 74.5% implied probability that no state will ban or pause police use by year-end.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedA qualifying restriction may be specific to Flock Safety or may apply to automated license plate reader cameras generally, so long as it covers cameras made by Flock Safety. A qualifying restriction need not be permanent; a temporary moratorium or pause will qualify.
Measures that impose conditions on use — including purpose limitations, data-retention limits, warrant requirements, audit requirements, or restrictions on data sharing — will not qualify. Only measures that prohibit, suspend, or pause the installation or operation of such cameras will qualify.
The restriction must come from a state. A restriction imposed by a city, county, or other political subdivision will not qualify. Qualifying restrictions must be imposed in accordance with the applicable state's constitutional and legal procedures, and may come via enacted legislation, executive order, court order applying statewide, or a binding directive issued by a state official or agency with statewide authority over the relevant police forces. Legislation that does not become law under the applicable state process, including vetoed bills that do not take effect, does not qualify.
A qualifying restriction imposed within the market timeframe will resolve this market "Yes" regardless of whether it is later lifted, repealed, enjoined, or overturned, and regardless of when it takes effect.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be official state legislative trackers, governor’s office announcements, secretary of state records, and other official information from the relevant state government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Market Opened: Aug 18, 2026, 3:46 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...A qualifying restriction may be specific to Flock Safety or may apply to automated license plate reader cameras generally, so long as it covers cameras made by Flock Safety. A qualifying restriction need not be permanent; a temporary moratorium or pause will qualify.
Measures that impose conditions on use — including purpose limitations, data-retention limits, warrant requirements, audit requirements, or restrictions on data sharing — will not qualify. Only measures that prohibit, suspend, or pause the installation or operation of such cameras will qualify.
The restriction must come from a state. A restriction imposed by a city, county, or other political subdivision will not qualify. Qualifying restrictions must be imposed in accordance with the applicable state's constitutional and legal procedures, and may come via enacted legislation, executive order, court order applying statewide, or a binding directive issued by a state official or agency with statewide authority over the relevant police forces. Legislation that does not become law under the applicable state process, including vetoed bills that do not take effect, does not qualify.
A qualifying restriction imposed within the market timeframe will resolve this market "Yes" regardless of whether it is later lifted, repealed, enjoined, or overturned, and regardless of when it takes effect.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be official state legislative trackers, governor’s office announcements, secretary of state records, and other official information from the relevant state government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...**Local-level pushback against Flock Safety license plate readers has intensified in 2026, with dozens of cities and counties canceling contracts or deactivating cameras over data-sharing, privacy, and immigration-enforcement concerns, yet no state has enacted a full ban or statewide pause.** More than 50 jurisdictions have taken such steps since January 2026, including recent actions in Rhode Island, Nebraska, Connecticut towns considering moratoria, and the LAPD’s July suspension pending stronger contractual safeguards. Washington’s SB 6002, effective March 2026, imposed the first statewide limits on ALPR access, retention, and permissible uses without prohibiting deployment. Flock has responded by recommending shorter data-retention periods and adding filters, while lawmakers in several states pursue targeted regulations rather than outright prohibitions. These patterns of localized decisions and incremental oversight, rather than uniform state-level bans, underpin traders’ 74.5% implied probability that no state will ban or pause police use by year-end.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated


Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions