The 2026 Heisman market remains tightly bunched at the top because a deep group of quarterbacks from College Football Playoff contenders enters the season with comparable profiles and supporting casts. CJ Carr and Arch Manning lead at 9% each after strong 2025 showings—Carr as a Notre Dame freshman starter and Manning with a strong finish at Texas—while Dante Moore, Darian Mensah, Julian Sayin, Trinidad Chambliss, and others sit just behind on the strength of prior production, transfers, and favorable team outlooks. Trader consensus prices reflect preseason uncertainty around individual workloads, offensive line and receiver upgrades, and schedule strength, with no single player holding a decisive edge in a field where historical Heisman winners typically emerge from blue-blood programs. Recent offseason developments such as spring practice reports and roster turnover have kept multiple names viable without creating separation.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedNCAA Football: 2026 Heisman Award Winner
CJ Carr 9%
Arch Manning 9%
Dante Moore 8%
Julian Sayin 7%
CJ Carr
9%
Arch Manning
9%
Dante Moore
8%
Julian Sayin
7%
Trinidad Chambliss
7%
Darian Mensah
7%
Jeremiah Smith
5%
Josh Hoover
4%
Marcel Reed
3%
Gunner Stockton
3%
Sam Leavitt
3%
Brendan Sorsby
3%
John Mateer
3%
Jayden Maiava
3%
Keelon Russell
3%
Malachi Toney
3%
Demond Williams Jr.
3%
LaNorris Sellers
3%
Rocco Becht
3%
Will Hammond
3%
Austin Mack
3%
Byrum Brown
3%
Bryce Underwood
3%
Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele
3%
Drew Mestemaker
1%
Kevin Jennings
1%
Ahmad Hardy
1%
Bo Jackson
1%
Kewan Lacy
1%
CJ Carr 9%
Arch Manning 9%
Dante Moore 8%
Julian Sayin 7%
CJ Carr
9%
Arch Manning
9%
Dante Moore
8%
Julian Sayin
7%
Trinidad Chambliss
7%
Darian Mensah
7%
Jeremiah Smith
5%
Josh Hoover
4%
Marcel Reed
3%
Gunner Stockton
3%
Sam Leavitt
3%
Brendan Sorsby
3%
John Mateer
3%
Jayden Maiava
3%
Keelon Russell
3%
Malachi Toney
3%
Demond Williams Jr.
3%
LaNorris Sellers
3%
Rocco Becht
3%
Will Hammond
3%
Austin Mack
3%
Byrum Brown
3%
Bryce Underwood
3%
Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele
3%
Drew Mestemaker
1%
Kevin Jennings
1%
Ahmad Hardy
1%
Bo Jackson
1%
Kewan Lacy
1%
If the ceremony is postponed after December 26, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, canceled, or a winner has not been announced within this timeframe, this market will resolve to "Other."
If multiple players are declared co-winners, this market will resolve in favor of the player whose listed name comes first alphabetically.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the Heisman Trophy Trust (https://www.heisman.com); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Market Opened: Jul 31, 2026, 6:35 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...If the ceremony is postponed after December 26, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, canceled, or a winner has not been announced within this timeframe, this market will resolve to "Other."
If multiple players are declared co-winners, this market will resolve in favor of the player whose listed name comes first alphabetically.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the Heisman Trophy Trust (https://www.heisman.com); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...The 2026 Heisman market remains tightly bunched at the top because a deep group of quarterbacks from College Football Playoff contenders enters the season with comparable profiles and supporting casts. CJ Carr and Arch Manning lead at 9% each after strong 2025 showings—Carr as a Notre Dame freshman starter and Manning with a strong finish at Texas—while Dante Moore, Darian Mensah, Julian Sayin, Trinidad Chambliss, and others sit just behind on the strength of prior production, transfers, and favorable team outlooks. Trader consensus prices reflect preseason uncertainty around individual workloads, offensive line and receiver upgrades, and schedule strength, with no single player holding a decisive edge in a field where historical Heisman winners typically emerge from blue-blood programs. Recent offseason developments such as spring practice reports and roster turnover have kept multiple names viable without creating separation.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated



Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions